F&K Estimatings Construction Cost Engineers
Menu
Sample Scope Walkthrough

Sample Walkthrough: Electrical Estimating for a 42-Story Office Tower

Representative project, not a client engagement. This walkthrough uses a typical project of this type to show how we approach the estimate. The building, location, quantities and dollar figures are illustrative; they are not taken from a specific client's job and are not results we are claiming.

A sample scope walkthrough of how we approach the Division 26, 27 and 28 estimate for a representative 42-story Class A office tower: feeder schedule checks, busway versus conduit-and-wire risers, cable tray coordination, and temporary power.

Prepared by Last updated

Building Type
42-story Class A office, ~680,000 SF (representative)
Representative Value
Not a priced engagement
Example Market
Chicago, IL (example)
Typical Client
General contractor or electrical subcontractor

Project Context

This walkthrough uses a representative high-rise: a 42-story, roughly 680,000 SF Class A office tower in a major US metro, bid design-bid-build with a short bid window. The estimate covers Division 26 (Electrical), Division 27 (Communications) and Division 28 (Electronic Safety and Security, including fire alarm).

What the Estimate Needs to Answer

  • Do the feeder sizes on the schedule match the loads they serve and the NEC ampacity rules?
  • Is a prefabricated busway riser worth pricing as an alternate to conduit and wire?
  • Where does cable tray conflict with structure or ductwork?
  • What temporary power does a multi-year high-rise schedule need?

Typical Challenges

1. Feeder Schedule Checks

The feeder schedule drives a large share of the copper cost. Before pricing it, the estimator cross-checks each feeder against the panel and equipment it serves:

  • Conductor size versus the overcurrent device rating and the ampacity tables in NEC Article 310
  • Adjustments the design may have missed: ambient temperature correction and adjustment for more than three current-carrying conductors in a raceway (NEC 310.15)
  • Voltage drop on long vertical runs, which may justify upsizing even where ampacity is adequate
  • Equipment grounding conductor sizes per NEC Table 250.122

When a feeder looks undersized for its load, the estimator does not quietly re-engineer it. The discrepancy goes to the engineer of record as a pre-bid RFI, and the bid states which size was priced.

2. Busway Versus Conduit and Wire Risers

When the design calls for conduit-and-wire risers, a common alternate is prefabricated busway. The comparison is labor-driven:

MethodMaterialField laborWhat to watch
Conduit and wire (as designed)Lower per footHigher: conduit install, pulling, terminations on every floorPull points, conduit fill, splice boxes
Prefabricated busway (alternate)Higher per footLower: bolted sections and plug-in or tap boxesLead time, fire-stopping at floor penetrations, engineer acceptance

Which is cheaper depends on local labor rates, riser height and the number of taps. The estimate prices both and shows the difference so the owner and engineer can decide.

3. Cable Tray Coordination

Cable tray elevations are overlaid on the structural and mechanical drawings. Wherever the tray crosses beams or main duct runs at the same elevation, the estimator notes the conflict and raises it as an RFI, because rerouting in the field adds fittings, supports and labor.

4. Temporary Power

Temporary power on a multi-year high-rise is a real cost center, not an allowance. A typical scope includes:

  • Temporary service and main distribution at grade
  • Temporary distribution panels on working floors, relocated as the building rises
  • Dedicated circuits for hoists and tower cranes, with lockable disconnects
  • Temporary lighting and GFCI-protected receptacles for the trades (NEC Article 590; OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart K)
  • Monthly utility and maintenance costs over the schedule, if they are the electrical contractor’s responsibility

Applicable Codes and Standards

  • NEC (NFPA 70) Article 310 – conductor ampacity and adjustment factors
  • NEC Article 250 – grounding and bonding
  • NEC Article 590 – temporary installations
  • NEC Article 725 – Class 2 and Class 3 power-limited circuits
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart K – electrical safety on construction sites

Software Workflow

SoftwarePurpose
AccubidElectrical takeoff, labor units and pricing
Bluebeam RevuMarkups, counts and quantity verification
AutoCADTray routing overlays and conflict checks

Common Estimating Risks

Risk areaWhy it mattersMitigation
Feeder sizes that do not match loadsCopper cost and change orders on the largest line itemCross-check feeders against loads; RFI before bid
Tray and duct conflictsRework, fittings and scheduleOverlay trade drawings before bid
Temporary power left as an allowanceUnpriced multi-year costPrice as line items with monthly durations
Labor rates from national averagesLabor is the largest cost driver in this scopeUse current local rates for the jurisdiction

Takeaways

  1. Feeders are where copper money is. Check them against the loads before pricing.
  2. Price riser alternates. Busway versus conduit and wire is often a meaningful decision on tall buildings.
  3. Temporary power is scope. On a multi-year job it deserves its own line items.

How We Apply This on Real Bids

For electrical bids, we take off Divisions 26, 27 and 28 separately, check the feeder schedule before pricing it, and list every discrepancy as an RFI. See our electrical estimating services, the conduit estimating guide, or pricing.

Bid-Risk Management

Price the Scope Before You Sign.

We apply the same method shown in this walkthrough to the drawings you send us: quantities by CSI division, code-driven scope called out, and open questions listed as RFIs.

Request a Quote

Project scope and delivery are confirmed in the written quote.

Share Service:
Chat with us